The no-fluff, no-filler guide to using ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and more to write irresistible grant proposals, keep your authentic voice, and get funded — on purpose.
Winning Grants with AI
How to Let AI Work FOR You — Without Losing Yourself
Copyright © 2025 Inga Nykole Goodwine. All rights reserved.
Published by Maximus Financial Group LLC | GetGrantsDaily.com | ingaNykole.com
No part of this ebook may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form without prior written permission of the author, except brief quotations in reviews or educational commentary.
Disclaimer: This ebook is for educational purposes only. Grant results vary. Always verify AI-generated content against funder requirements. No guarantee of funding is expressed or implied.
A note on templates: All budget, resume, and supporting document templates are illustrative examples. Customize every template to reflect your organization's actual data before use.
FUNDED ON PURPOSE™
Let me be real with you from jump.
I've been writing grants, coaching founders, and helping nonprofits get funded long before artificial intelligence was a household phrase. And when AI hit the mainstream, I had two choices: be scared of it, or make it work for me. You already know which one I chose.
But here's what most "AI for grants" content gets wrong — they hand you a tool and tell you to copy-paste your way to funding. That's not a strategy. That's how you sound like a robot. Grant reviewers can tell. Funders can feel it. And that generic, hollow language will get your proposal sent straight to the reject pile.
The AI is not the writer. You are the writer. AI is your most powerful assistant — but you are always the architect.
This ebook is for the founder who is ready to stop being intimidated by AI and start being empowered by it. It's for the nonprofit leader who has a God-given mission and needs the funds to match. It's for the woman over 45 who has been sleeping on her gifts and is finally ready to wake up. It's for every person who has said, "I don't even know where to start."
I'm going to teach you the tools. The real ones. The hidden features. The prompts that actually work. How to train AI like it's your personal assistant — because that is exactly what it is. And most importantly: how to give it your mind so it gives your voice right back to you.
This is how you win grants with AI. This is how you stay Funded on Purpose.
How to use this book: Read it once for the big picture. Then go back chapter by chapter and do the work. Every prompt box is meant to be used — open your AI tool and run these prompts as you read. The appendix holds your master prompt library for quick reference anytime.
Before we talk about prompts and proposals, let's talk about what we're actually dealing with. When you understand what AI is and where it came from, you stop being afraid of it — and you start using it with intention.
Artificial intelligence didn't start with ChatGPT. The concept goes back to 1950, when mathematician Alan Turing asked: Can machines think? His work introduced the Turing Test — could a machine converse so naturally that a human couldn't tell the difference? For decades, AI lived in research labs and science fiction. Then the internet happened. Big Data. Smartphones. Suddenly machines had access to more human language and behavior than anyone had imagined. That data fed machine learning — software that learns patterns instead of following manually programmed rules.
In 2017, a team at Google published "Attention Is All You Need" — the technical blueprint for every major AI tool you're using today. ChatGPT. Claude. Gemini. The "GPT" stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer. These tools were trained on billions of pages of human text — grant proposals, legal documents, poetry, stories, nonprofit reports, everything.
Here's what makes it wild: These tools don't "know" things the way you do. They predict the most statistically likely next word given everything they've learned. They can sound confident and still be wrong. Your job is to be the brain. Let AI be the pen.
Grant writing is one of the most language-intensive, precision-requiring tasks in the nonprofit world. AI was trained on more grant language and persuasive writing than any human will read in a lifetime. When you use these tools right, you're accessing a pattern-recognition engine that has processed thousands of funded proposals. The key is knowing how to talk to it.
"Explain to me in simple terms how you generate text. What are you actually doing when I ask a question? I want to understand what I'm working with so I can use you more effectively for grant writing."
Not all AI tools are created equal. Each has its own personality, strength, and sweet spot. Here's your essential breakdown.
Best for long-form drafts, brainstorming, and full grant sections. GPT-4o has real-time web browsing. Excellent for structure and first drafts.
Exceptional at maintaining your voice over long documents. Best for editing, tone refinement, and its 200K-token context window for full proposals.
Deeply integrated with Google Workspace. If your org lives in Google Docs, Gemini is your power move. Strong for research and real-time web data.
The underrated research powerhouse. Pulls live data with citations. Use this first when researching funders, demographics, and statistics.
| Task | Best Tool | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Finding grant opportunities | Perplexity + ChatGPT | Live web access + broad reasoning |
| Writing a needs statement | Claude or ChatGPT | Long-form, nuanced, emotional |
| Budget narrative | ChatGPT or Claude | Structured, detailed formatting |
| Editing for voice and tone | Claude | Best at following voice instructions |
| Researching the funder | Perplexity or Gemini | Live data + Google integration |
| Creating a logic model | Claude or ChatGPT | Table formatting + systems thinking |
"Before we start on my grant proposal, please ask me 5 questions that will help you understand my voice, my mission, and my community — so everything you help me write sounds like me, not like an AI."
Save a "master voice profile" document and paste it at the start of every new AI session. Train the tool once — then it's ready instantly every time.
The people using AI at the highest level aren't using it the way tutorials show. Here's your insider access.
Settings → Personalization → Custom Instructions. Tell ChatGPT who you are and how you want it to respond — permanently, for every conversation. Set your role, tone preferences, and what you don't want it to do.
"About me: I am [name], founder of [org]. We serve [population] in [location]. My writing is direct, passionate, rooted in community impact. How I want responses: Always use active voice. Mirror my voice — warm but professional. If unsure, ask rather than assume."
Canvas Mode (GPT-4o): Collaborate on a document in real time — like Google Docs with AI co-editing. Highlight a section and ask it to "rewrite more passionately" or "shorten by 30%." A game-changer for grant editing. Memory: Turn on in Settings → Personalization → Memory. Tell it your EIN, mission, key programs — it remembers for next time.
Claude's Projects feature creates a dedicated space for a specific grant with documents, context, and style instructions saved. Drop your previous funded proposals in. It learns and holds context within that project for the full grant cycle.
"I'm uploading several documents to give you full context about my organization. Read them carefully, then summarize what you've learned — our mission, strengths, voice, and the community we serve. After that, we'll begin the grant proposal together."
Gemini's Deep Research runs a multi-step research process and delivers a full cited report. Research a specific funder — priorities, past grantees, average amounts, application process — in minutes, not hours.
End any prompt with: "Before you respond, ask me any clarifying questions that would help you give a better answer." This one habit dramatically improves output quality every single time.
Flip the script: make AI ask you questions. You answer. Then it writes from what you gave it. That's how you get content that sounds like you.
"I need your help writing a compelling [section] for a grant application. Instead of generating something generic, interview me first. Ask me 10 deep, thoughtful questions — one at a time — that will help you truly understand my organization, the people we serve, what makes us different, and what drives me personally. After I've answered all 10, use my exact language and stories to craft the section. Do not start writing until I've answered every question. Ready? Ask me question one."
"I am going to give you everything you need to know about me and my organization. Read carefully and confirm understanding before we begin:"
"Once you've absorbed this, tell me what you now understand about who I am."
The rule: Answer interview questions in your natural voice. Don't edit yourself. Talk like you're on a podcast. The rawness is the gold. The AI does the polishing.
You are giving AI your mind. It is not giving you its mind. The mirror only shows what you hold up to it.
Before asking AI to write anything, write a messy, unfiltered paragraph about what you want to say. Stream of consciousness. Don't edit. This gives AI your actual voice material.
Paste your raw writing and say: "Here is how I naturally write. Use this as a voice sample. Help me write [section] in this same voice — keep my energy, directness, and heart."
Read every AI-generated paragraph aloud. If you stumble or it sounds weird in your mouth, it's not your voice. Mark it and revise.
For every sentence: would I actually say this in a room full of people? If no — rewrite it, with or without AI.
Every powerful voice has signature phrases. Mine is "Funded on Purpose." Identify your 3–5 power phrases and teach AI to weave them in naturally.
"Paste a writing sample from work I've done. Read it carefully and identify: (1) my tone and energy level, (2) my preferred sentence structure, (3) words or phrases that are distinctly mine, and (4) what makes my writing different from generic grant writing. Use this analysis to guide everything you write for me going forward."
| Section | Purpose | AI's Role |
|---|---|---|
| Executive Summary | Hook the reviewer in 2 minutes | Tighten and punch up your draft |
| Needs Statement | Prove the problem is real and urgent | Research data + emotional narrative |
| Project Description | Show your solution clearly | Structure + active language |
| Goals & Objectives | Measurable SMART outcomes | Formatting and specificity |
| Evaluation Plan | How you'll prove success | Methodology and metrics language |
| Budget + Narrative | Justify every dollar | Line-item explanations |
| Organizational History | Prove you can execute | Compelling storytelling from your facts |
| Board & Staff Resumes | Show team credibility | Polishing bios and credentials |
| Logic Model | Map inputs to outcomes visually | Structuring your theory of change |
| Letters of Support | Community credibility | Drafting templates for partners |
| Supporting Documents | Proof and compliance | Organizing and summarizing attachments |
"I'm going to paste the RFP requirements. After reading them, please: (1) list every requirement in bullet form, (2) tell me which are most heavily weighted based on language and space allocation, and (3) identify any commonly overlooked requirements. Then we'll write the proposal together, responding directly to every point."
[Paste RFP text here]
Do NOT submit AI-generated text without thoroughly reading, editing, and verifying every fact. AI hallucinations — made-up statistics, incorrect citations, nonexistent programs — are real. Every number, every citation, every claim must be verified by you before submission.
Grant proposals are scored using a rubric — a structured guide reviewers use to evaluate every application consistently. Understanding the rubric changes how you write entirely.
| Category | Typical Weight | What Reviewers Look For |
|---|---|---|
| Statement of Need | 20–25% | Clearly defined, data-supported problem that connects to the funder's priorities |
| Goals & Objectives | 15–20% | SMART: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound |
| Project Plan | 20–25% | Realistic, detailed plan that directly addresses the stated need |
| Evaluation | 10–15% | Clear methods for measuring success, with tools and responsible parties named |
| Organizational Capacity | 10–15% | Staff, experience, and infrastructure to actually execute the plan |
| Budget | 10–15% | Reasonable, justified amounts aligned with the project plan |
The rubric secret: When a funder publishes their rubric — and many do — download it. Paste it into your AI tool and ask it to help you write each section to directly address every criterion. This alone sets you apart from most applicants.
"Here is the scoring rubric: [paste rubric]. For each criterion, tell me: (1) what a maximum-score response looks like, (2) what a mediocre response looks like, and (3) the specific questions I need to answer in my proposal to earn full points. Then we'll write each section targeting the top score."
"Role-play as an experienced grant reviewer who has read 200 proposals this cycle. You're a little tired, you care deeply about impact, and you're looking for proposals that are clear, compelling, and specific. Read my draft and tell me: where did your attention drift? What was unclear? What made you skeptical? What made you lean forward?"
[Paste your draft]
Your mission statement answers three questions in two or three sentences: Who are you? Who do you serve? What change are you making? No fluff. No filler. Pure purpose.
"I want to write a powerful mission statement. Interview me one question at a time before writing anything: (1) Who specifically do we serve? (2) What is the core gap we address? (3) What does our org DO — in verb form? (4) What does success look like for the people we serve? (5) What one word defines our approach? After my answers, draft 3 versions: formal, warm, and bold."
A great organizational narrative covers: your founding story, key programs and proven impact, leadership qualifications, financial health, and community relationships. It's not a resume — it's a journey.
"Help me write an organizational narrative for a grant proposal. I'll share our history, programs, outcomes, and leadership. Shape this into a compelling story — not a resume. Make a funder feel confident, moved, and certain we are the right organization for this work. Here is our information: [share details]"
Every goal must be SMART. Reviewers score objectives heavily. Vague language like "we will improve outcomes" earns zero points. Specific language like "75% of participants will demonstrate a 20% increase in financial literacy scores on standardized pre/post assessment by month 12" earns full points.
"Help me write 3 project goals and 9 measurable SMART objectives (3 per goal) for my grant proposal. Each objective must be Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Base them on this project description: [details]. Format as: Goal 1: [statement], then Objectives 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 beneath each."
A budget without a narrative is numbers without a story. Every dollar must earn its place on the page. The budget narrative justifies each line — explaining not just what you're spending on, but why that spending is necessary, reasonable, and directly tied to your project goals.
| Line Item | Description | Calculation | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Personnel | |||
| Program Director | Oversees all project activities, reporting, and partner coordination | $65,000 salary × 50% FTE | $32,500 |
| Case Manager | Direct service delivery to program participants | $42,000 salary × 100% FTE | $42,000 |
| Admin Coordinator | Data entry, scheduling, recordkeeping | $36,000 salary × 25% FTE | $9,000 |
| Personnel Subtotal | $83,500 | ||
| B. Fringe Benefits | |||
| Fringe Benefits | Health insurance, payroll taxes, retirement (28% of personnel) | $83,500 × 28% | $23,380 |
| Fringe Subtotal | $23,380 | ||
| C. Contractual / Consultants | |||
| Evaluation Consultant | External evaluator for program outcomes and data analysis | $85/hr × 80 hours | $6,800 |
| Financial Trainer | Workshop facilitation — 6 sessions for participants | $500/session × 6 | $3,000 |
| Contractual Subtotal | $9,800 | ||
| D. Supplies & Materials | |||
| Program Supplies | Workbooks, printing, participant materials | $50/participant × 60 | $3,000 |
| Office Supplies | General administrative supplies for grant period | Lump sum | $800 |
| Supplies Subtotal | $3,800 | ||
| E. Travel | |||
| Local Mileage | Staff travel to partner sites and participant home visits | 500 miles × $0.67 | $335 |
| Conference Travel | 1 staff member to national field conference | Airfare + hotel + per diem (3 days) | $1,800 |
| Travel Subtotal | $2,135 | ||
| F. Indirect Costs | |||
| Indirect / Admin | Organizational overhead — utilities, insurance, shared staff time | 10% of direct costs | $12,262 |
| TOTAL PROJECT BUDGET | $134,877 | ||
Program Director (50% FTE — $32,500): The Program Director will dedicate 50% of their time to overseeing all project activities, managing the timeline, and ensuring compliance. At a salary of $65,000 annually — commensurate with regional benchmarks — the 50% allocation reflects the oversight needed to serve 60 participants while maintaining rigorous data collection and reporting.
Evaluation Consultant ($6,800): An independent external evaluator will conduct pre/post assessments and produce a final evaluation report. At $85/hour — consistent with regional rates for qualified evaluators — the 80 hours covers instrument development, data analysis, and reporting. External evaluation ensures objectivity and strengthens the credibility of our outcomes.
"I need to write a budget narrative for my grant. Here is my line-item budget: [paste budget]. For each line item, write 2–4 sentences that: (1) name the item and amount, (2) explain specifically how it supports project goals, and (3) show the cost is reasonable and necessary. Connect every item back to our program outcomes. Keep language clear and non-bureaucratic."
Funders don't just fund programs — they fund people. Your board of directors is not a formality. It is a statement of organizational credibility, community trust, and governance strength.
Board [Title: Chair / Vice Chair / Treasurer / Secretary / Member] | Term: [Start Year]–Present
[Current job title, employer, and brief description of professional responsibilities]
[Highest degree], [Field] — [Institution], [Year]
[Additional certifications relevant to board role]
[2–3 sentences describing the specific skills this member brings to governance. Be specific: "Maria brings 15 years of nonprofit financial management experience and oversees our budget review process each quarter."]
[Describe any personal or professional connection to the community the organization serves.]
[Name specific committees, initiatives led, or major decisions contributed to. Example: "Chaired the 2024 strategic planning process."]
[Other nonprofit boards, professional associations, or community organizations — shows breadth of network]
"Help me write a compelling one-paragraph board member bio for a grant application. Here is the information: [name, job, education, tenure, committee role, connection to our mission]. The bio should: sound professional but warm, highlight the specific value they bring to governance, mention their connection to the community, and be written in third person. Keep it under 150 words."
If your board is small or new, focus the narrative on quality and intentionality of governance — not size. A lean, active board is more impressive than a large board that exists only on paper.
Supporting documents are the receipts that back up every claim in your proposal. Many proposals are declined not because the writing was weak — but because the documentation was missing, incomplete, or poorly assembled.
Your 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status letter. Non-negotiable for foundation and government grants. Keep the original and a clean scan on file at all times.
Certificate of Incorporation or Articles of Organization from your state. Confirm it is current — many states require annual renewals.
A complete organizational budget showing total income and expenses by category. Different from your project budget — this shows you can manage money at the organizational level.
Most foundations require 1–3 years of audited financials. If below the audit threshold, a Reviewed Financial Statement or CPA-prepared statements may be accepted — clarify with the funder.
Your annual information return filed with the IRS. Funders use this to assess governance, compensation, financial health, and compliance. Make sure it is complete and accurate.
A current list of all board members with professional affiliations and contact information. Update before every submission — nothing signals disorganization like an outdated board list.
A visual showing your governance and staffing structure. Includes the board, executive leadership, and key program staff.
A month-by-month or quarter-by-quarter Gantt chart or table showing when each activity occurs, who is responsible, and what milestone it leads to.
A visual framework mapping your inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes, and long-term impact. Covered in depth in Chapter 12.
Letters from community partners, government agencies, or beneficiary representatives. Covered in Chapter 13.
Required for all federal grants. Your Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) from SAM.gov. Must be active and renewed annually.
Memoranda of Understanding with partner organizations. If your proposal describes collaboration, funders want documented proof.
Past annual reports, program evaluations, or outcome data demonstrating your track record of impact. Numbers with stories behind them are most compelling.
"I am preparing to submit a grant to [funder type: federal / private foundation / corporate]. Help me create a complete checklist of supporting documents I need, organized by: (1) always required, (2) commonly required for this funder type, and (3) documents that would strengthen my application even if not required. Then flag any that typically cause problems or delays."
A logic model is a one-page visual that maps how your program works — from the resources you start with all the way to the long-term impact you're working toward. Many funders require it. All funders respect it.
Staff & volunteers
Grant funding
Facilities
Partner orgs
Participant time
Workshops
Case management
Coaching sessions
Training programs
Community events
# participants served
# sessions delivered
# referrals made
# materials distributed
# hours of service
Increased knowledge
Behavior change
Improved skills
Economic stability
Community trust
Long-term community transformation
Systemic change
Reduced disparity
Sustained self-sufficiency
The logic model rule: Every activity must connect to an output. Every output must connect to an outcome. Every outcome must connect to your impact. A break in the chain anywhere — and a reviewer will find it.
"Help me create a logic model for my program: [describe your program]. Organize into five columns: Inputs, Activities, Outputs, Short-Term Outcomes, and Long-Term Impact. Make sure every activity connects directly to at least one output and one outcome. Use concrete, measurable language. Present in a table format I can paste into my grant application."
| Outcome | Indicator | Data Source | Method | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased financial literacy | % passing post-assessment | Participant assessments | Pre/post survey | Each workshop |
| Improved credit scores | Average credit score change | Credit reports (consent) | Baseline + 6-month follow-up | Month 1 & 7 |
| Secured income / employment | # gaining new employment | Participant self-report | Quarterly check-in | Quarterly |
"Help me write an evaluation plan for my grant proposal. My program goals are: [list goals]. My target outcomes are: [list outcomes]. Please create an evaluation framework with: (1) specific measurable indicators per outcome, (2) data collection methods and tools, (3) who is responsible, (4) a timeline, and (5) how findings will drive continuous improvement. Use a table format."
Letters of support are third-party endorsements telling the funder: "This organization is real, trusted, and needed in our community." A strong letter can elevate a good proposal to a great one. A generic letter can actually hurt you.
[Partner Organization Letterhead]
[Date]
[Funder Name and Address]
Dear [Program Officer's Name or Review Committee],
I am writing on behalf of [Partner Organization] in strong support of [Your Organization]'s application for [Grant Name]. We have partnered with [Your Organization] for [X years / since year], and I can speak directly to the quality of their work and the depth of their impact in our shared community.
[Specific paragraph: describe one collaboration, referral relationship, or witnessed outcome. Name the program, the population, and what changed. Be concrete.]
In support of this proposed project, [Partner Organization] is prepared to [state specific commitment: provide referrals, share space, contribute staff time, co-facilitate workshops, etc.]. We believe this project is essential because [state why the need is real and urgent from your perspective].
We have full confidence in [Your Organization]'s ability to execute this work with excellence, accountability, and deep community trust.
Respectfully,
[Signatory Name]
[Title] | [Organization]
[Phone] | [Email]
"I need to provide a letter of support template to a partner organization for my grant application. Write a professional, specific, compelling template they can customize. The partner is [type of org]. Our collaboration involves [describe it]. The grant is focused on [topic]. The letter should: open with their direct connection to us, describe a specific example of our work together, name the commitment they're making, and close with a strong endorsement. Leave [brackets] for them to personalize."
Reach out to partners at least 3 weeks before your deadline. Provide the template, the deadline, the funder's name, and a one-paragraph project summary. Make it as easy as possible for them to say yes and turn it around quickly.
The needs statement lives or dies on research. AI has fundamentally changed what's possible — in hours instead of days.
"I need current, accurate data to support a needs statement about [issue area] in [geography]. Please compile: (1) current population statistics, (2) relevant rates — poverty, unemployment, health indicators — that speak to the urgency of [issue], (3) any recent reports documenting this need. Cite sources clearly so I can verify each one."
"I am preparing to apply to [Funder Name]. Please research: (1) their top current funding priorities, (2) recent grants made — to what organizations, in what amounts, for what purposes, (3) language and values they use consistently that I should mirror, and (4) any red flags — project types they've declined or moved away from. Cite sources."
"Using the following data, help me write a compelling needs statement that: opens with a human story or vivid image (NOT a statistic), presents data clearly and compellingly, explains why the problem persists, and bridges to why our organization is the right response. Here is the information: [paste research]"
Always verify every statistic at its original source before submitting. AI can misremember, misdate, or misattribute data. Go to the original report. Download it. Cite the page number. Grant reviewers check.
Facts tell. Stories sell. And in grant writing, both need to be on the page — dancing together.
Data earns credibility. Story earns the heart. The proposals that get funded almost always have both. This chapter is about making sure your passion, your journey, and your community's humanity shows up on every page.
"I want to find the most powerful story moments from my organization's history to use in grant proposals. Ask me questions that will surface: (1) the origin story in human, specific detail, (2) a participant success story that captures our impact, (3) a moment when things were hard but we kept going — and what that revealed, and (4) what I personally believe about the people we serve that most people don't know. Ask these one at a time."
"I've written a draft of my [section]. It feels too formal and sterile — it doesn't sound like someone who is passionate about this work. Without changing the facts or structure, please rewrite this section so the conviction and care behind our mission come through in every paragraph. Keep it professional but make it feel alive. Here is the draft: [paste text]"
The last 48 hours before a grant deadline are where applications are won or lost by the unprepared. Use this checklist every single time — no exceptions.
| ☐ | Item | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Every required section complete and within word/page limits | Re-read the RFP one final time |
| ☐ | All statistics verified with original sources | No AI hallucinations — check every number |
| ☐ | Budget math is correct — totals match across all documents | Have someone else check the numbers |
| ☐ | Budget narrative addresses every line item | Not just the big ones |
| ☐ | All required attachments included and correctly labeled | Match funder's naming requirements exactly |
| ☐ | IRS determination letter included and current | Should be the original letter |
| ☐ | 990 and/or audited financials included | Most recent available year |
| ☐ | Board list is current — updated within 90 days | Names, titles, affiliations all current |
| ☐ | Letters of support: dated, signed, on letterhead | Dated within 90 days of deadline |
| ☐ | SAM.gov registration active (federal grants only) | Check expiration date |
| ☐ | Executive Director / authorized signatory has signed | Check funder's signature requirements |
| ☐ | Proposal has been read aloud for voice and clarity | Does it still sound like you? |
| ☐ | Final document submitted — confirmation screenshot saved | Never submit on deadline day if possible |
"Help me write a brief, warm, professional thank-you email to send to the program officer at [funder name] after submitting our application for [project name]. It should: thank them for the opportunity, express genuine enthusiasm for their mission, offer to provide any additional information, and be no more than 4 sentences. Not sycophantic or pushy."
The knowledge you've gained in this ebook? Other people will pay for it. A digital product is one of the fastest, lowest-cost ways to generate income — today, not next quarter. Create it once. Sell it while you sleep.
"I want to create a low-ticket digital product about [topic] for [target audience]. Help me: (1) name it in a way that makes someone immediately want it, (2) outline the complete product structure, (3) write the sales description in 3 punchy sentences, and (4) suggest a fair price point based on depth and specificity of content."
Bookmark this section. These are your go-to prompts — organized by task — ready to copy, customize, and use anytime.
"Before we begin, here is my voice profile: [name, org, mission, style, signature phrases, what to avoid]. Please confirm you understand this and apply it to everything you write for me in this session."
"For this session, act as a seasoned grant writer with 20 years of experience securing federal, foundation, and corporate grants for nonprofits. You know what funders look for, what makes proposals fail, and how to write with both precision and passion. Approach every task from that expertise."
"Research [Funder Name] and give me: (1) their top 3 current funding priorities, (2) 5 examples of recent grants with amounts, (3) language they use consistently that I should mirror, (4) the average grant size they award, and (5) one thing most applicants get wrong about applying to them."
"Compile current data on [issue area] in [geography]. Include: population affected, relevant rates, recent studies, and at least 3 compelling statistics I can use in a needs statement. Cite every source so I can verify."
"Write a 250-word executive summary for my grant proposal. Hook the reviewer immediately, state the problem, describe our solution and who it serves, name the requested amount and how it will be used, and close with our track record. Active voice. Make every sentence earn its place. Here is the project info: [details]"
"Help me write a sustainability section explaining how we'll continue this program after the grant period ends. Include: other funding sources we're pursuing, earned revenue strategies, community investment, and how the capacity built during this grant will outlast the funding. Base it on: [your actual sustainability plan]."
"Please review this grant section for: (1) passive voice — rewrite in active, (2) vague or hollow phrases — replace with specific language, (3) any sentence over 25 words — break it up, (4) any claim needing stronger evidence, and (5) overall tone — does it sound like a passionate, credible leader? [Paste section]"
"Please reduce this section from [X] words to [Y] words without losing critical information, weakening any argument, or changing the voice. Prioritize cutting filler phrases, redundant points, and over-explanation. [Paste text]"
| Weeks Out | Task |
|---|---|
| 8–10 weeks | Identify opportunity, read RFP thoroughly, check eligibility |
| 6–8 weeks | Funder research, gather community data, begin needs statement draft |
| 4–6 weeks | Draft all narrative sections, develop budget, request letters of support |
| 2–4 weeks | Internal review, revisions, collect all supporting documents |
| 1–2 weeks | Final editing, proofreading, voice check, format review |
| 48–72 hours | Submit early (never on deadline day), screenshot confirmation |
| 24 hours after | Send thank-you to program officer |
"You didn't come this far to be broke, overlooked, or underfunded. The money exists. The tools exist. Now go get it."
For training, consulting, grants, and more:
ingaNykole.com
GetGrantsDaily.com · TheGrantVault.com · ProMAXHub.com